Global recession linked to David Bowie

David Bowie has been accused of causing the current recession by being one of the first to adopt a means of borrowing known as ‘securitisation’.

Okay, stick with me here. Back in 1997 Bowie realised that he was missing out on a whole load of money that was rightfully his – all the money he hadn’t made yet. So, he came up with the idea of “Bowie Bonds”, which saw the singer sell off the projected royalties from his first 25 albums for $55 million to the Prudential Insurance Company. So far, so good. Bowie has a big stack of cash, which he used to buy the publishing rights to his entire catalogue, and The Pru has a steady income from now until the end of time (or until sales of recorded music start to tail off, but that’ll probably never happen, right?).

So successful was the idea, that artists including James Brown and The Isley Brothers followed suit. As did banks. Although the banks weren’t selling on future revenues from songs they recorded, they were selling on future revenues from mortgages, which is all well and good until large amounts of people start defaulting on those loans, leaving the new owners of the loans suddenly out of pocket in a big way. As we have now seen, this leads to what is now known as a credit crunch, where people realise all of that pretend money they bought isn’t actually worth anything.

So, if you’re feeling the squeeze at the moment, you know who to blame. Bloody David Bowie. If it weren’t for him, banks would be the ethical institutions we always knew them to be. They’re just easily led astray, is all. Although, I should probably point out, it was a banker who originally suggested the bonds idea to Bowie.

This article originally appeared in CMU Daily on 14 Jan 2009.

3 thoughts on “Global recession linked to David Bowie

  1. I would totally buy this argument if the David Bowie in the article were not the glam rocker we all know, but some schmo from New Jersey posing as David Bowie and selling unproven music, but representing it as David’s material.

    The problem was never securitization, which has existed as long as we’ve been factoring receivables. The problem was selling sow’s ears as silk purses.

  2. Bill is right of course, what David was selling was actually worth something, more than enough of something for a reputable insurance company to buy it. The morgage crimes are exactly the opposite, a fraude perpetrated by criminals who will probably never see a jail let alone do time.

  3. The idea that David Bowie is to blame for our global recession is rubbish, whatever ‘data’ is gathered to justify this opinion.
    What next? Will Mick Jagger be linked to the fall of Saigon? Did Keith Richard start the war in Vietnam?
    But of course…Jack White will be our great shining hope to turn the worlds woes ’round.
    David is a performer and an extremely adept businessman.
    End of story.
    One must take responsibility for ones own actions before one points fingers. That, sisters and brothers, is the largest problem we have in today’s society: LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY.
    Just my peace.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.